Thu 1 April
Inflammaging
Which inflammatory pathways are causal, and in which patients?
- Inflammasome and NLRP3
- Clearance checkpoints
- Organ crosstalk
- Mitochondrial dysfunction
Confirmed
Cambridge
Massachusetts
Evening symposia on how the immune system changes with age, and what we can do about it.
§ 01
The premise
In July 2026, ziltivekimab lowered IL‑6 and hsCRP in 6,376 patients as designed but did not reduce cardiovascular events.1 Novo Nordisk has since stopped its heart failure trial early, and the remaining trial, ARTEMIS, reports in the first half of 2027.2
§ 02
The nights
Each evening opens with a keynote on the night's question and ends with dinner, where every table takes up one of the five questions below.
Thu 1 April
Which inflammatory pathways are causal, and in which patients?
Confirmed
Thu 15 April
Can we rebuild immune output and repertoire instead of only suppressing inflammation?
Confirmed
Date TBD
What evidence would convince a regulator or a skeptical trialist?
Contingent on funding
§ 03
The spine
The same five questions structure every night. They are also the application questions, the table prompts at dinner and the outline of the written playbook we will publish afterward.
| Question | I · Inflammaging | II · Rejuvenation | III · Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01Modality | Cytokine blockade, inflammasome, or clearance? | What can be given safely and repeatedly to an 80-year-old? | What does a tool need to measure to settle that choice? |
| 02Stratification | ZEUS selected patients on hsCRP and still failed.1 Was the marker wrong, or the target? | Who has enough reserve left to rebuild? | Which stratifiers are registrational today? |
| 03Endpoints | Outcome trials need about 6,000 patients.1 What would a regulator accept instead? | Are TRECs, repertoire and vaccine response endpoints, or only measurements? | When does a signal become a surrogate? |
| 04Biomarkers | Which markers are still decision-grade after ZEUS? | Which markers track the intervention rather than the disease? | What would it take to qualify a clock? |
| 05Trial design | Is a single agent enough, or are combinations needed? | Which first indication best de-risks a platform? | What is the smallest trial a partner would fund? |
§ 04
The evening
About 100 people in one room. Talks are recorded and published. Dinner and everything after it are under the Chatham House rule.
§ 05
Attending
The application asks which of the five questions you most want answered, and for your own answer in two sentences.
§ 06
Partners
Partners do not receive speaking slots. They are acknowledged on this site, in the printed program and from the podium.
Series Partner
Acknowledged at both nights, on this site, in the program and on the closing slide. Four guest seats per night and an early copy of the written playbook.
Night Partner
Acknowledged as the partner for one night, on this site and in that night's program. Three guest seats that evening.
Supporting Partner
Listed on this site and in both programs, with two guest seats per night.
In kind
For an event of this size, food, space or AV support can matter as much as funding. In-kind partners are acknowledged in the same way as Night Partners.
Sources
The full case, with references, is on the why-now page.